Biodiversity and the EIA process
Considering Biodiversity In The EIA Process
What Is Biodiversity?
The Convention on Biological Diversity defines Biodiversity as the variability among living organisms from all sources including terrestrial (land), marine (sea), and other aquatic ecosystems and the ecological complexes of which they are part; this includes diversity within species, between species and of ecosystems.
In simpler terms, Biodiversity is all the living creatures, plants and animals, on and in the earth, water and air in a particular place. Biodiversity also describes the interaction between these living creatures and the area (ecosystem) in which they live.
Why Is Biodiversity Important?
Biodiversity supports human life and livelihoods in that it provides a number of ‘ecosystem services’:
is a source of food, medicine, fuel, grazing for livestock, and building materials
contributes to food supply, for example the pollination of commercially viable crops, such as citrus, grapes and apples; the continued productivity of soils, and the control of pests and diseases
is essential for the regulation or control of natural processes that support human life, for example, soil formation, reduction of carbon that contributes to global warming (the potential increase in the temperature of the earth’s atmosphere caused by pollution), recycling of nutrients, and the supply and purification of water
it helps to regulate floods and protects against storm surges
provides space for leisure and tourism
has social, health and spritual benefits for humans, and contributes to their quality of life
How Is Biodiversity Affected By Development?
Habitat loss and degradation, for example, the destruction of wetlands, grasslands and indigenous forests for housing estates or low cost housing.
Habitat fragmentation – ecosystems and the species therein, need a certain amount of interconnectivity for processes to continue. If a specific natural area is broken up into smaller pieces, eventually species disappear and certain functions are lost. For example, a large intact wetland can fulfill its functions far better than a wetland that is divided into two pieces.
Loss of species, for example the plants and animals endemic to a particular habitat will not be able to survive if that habitat is destroyed or altered by development.
Natural environmental processes, such as continued river flow, water purification, and erosion control, are affected. This can lead to an accumulated effect on both habitat and species. Or, this can continue to affect habitats and therefore species into the long-term until they die out.
Direct impacts, for example birds colliding with power lines, electrocutions.
Alien invasive organisms that can transform natural habitats.
Pollution effects on ecosystems and thus species.
How To Consider Biodiversity In The EIA Process
Typically what happens (or should happen) during the EIA process is that the impacts on Biodiversity are investigated by a specialist – people with the correct qualifications in botany, ecology, entomology etc. usually at a postgraduate level. Specialists who can focus broadly on the impacts across the ecosystem should be brought in early. These specialists will not focus merely on fish for example, but more generally on the entire freshwater ecosystem, or not merely on mammals but on the entire terrestrial ecosystem. Later, once the general impacts are identified, specialists on fish, botany (plants), mammals, birds, geology etc could be involved where relevant. The specialist could be an ecologist from the local conservation agency or a consultant. These specialist studies are usually conducted in the following fields of Biodiversity (depending on the type of development):
Botany Or Terrestrial Ecology Which could include a wetlands, grasslands, fynbos, forest or other habitat component
Freshwater Ecology Which could include a wetlands, riverine, grasslands or other habitat component
Marine Or Estuarine Ecology Coastal, sea or estuarine habitats
Geology Soil erosion, suitability for development
Reptiles Sometimes the last four are all grouped together under vertebrates (animals with a backbone)
Invertebrates – Animals without a backbone
The specialist has to look at how ecosystems and species could be affected by development, and how best the development can be designed, located and managed to avoid negative impacts or result in benefits to Biodiversity.
When assessing the likely significance of an activity, it is important to take the following into consideration:
Legal requirements with regard to Biodiversity – e.g. protected or regulated species or ecosystems (National Environmental Management Biodiversity Act 2005, provincial Acts, etc.)
National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan; as well as
In addition it is important to consider the impacts of the proposed activity/s on
Biodiversity pattern (this will be the structure and composition). The impacts on the Biodiversity pattern should be assessed at both species level as well as ecosystem level (ie. considering landscapes as well as development sites).
Biodiversity process (function). The impacts on the Biodiversity process should be assessed at both species level as well as ecosystem level.
Ecosystem services (as described above) and the associated effects on those people or communities, or society at large, who may depend on these services for their livelihoods or wellbeing.
It is not only essential to assess the impacts on the affected site, but also to consider the impacts beyond the site (in a regional and catchments context). In addition, it is important to think of both direct (eg. clearing of vegetation) as well as indirect impacts (eg downstream impacts of on-site changes in water flow) and cumulative (additive) impacts. For more detailed guidance on the above, please access the DEADP Guidelines and CBBIA Guidelines provided below.
Generally, the impacts are assessed by the specialists according to the following criteria drawn from the EIA Regulations, published by the Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (April 1998) in terms of the Environmental Conservation Act No. 73 of 1989. These criteria may change according to the specialist field. These criteria include:
CRITERIA FOR IMPACT ASSESSMENT SPECIALISTS
Description of elements that are central to each issue
Nature of impact
This is an appraisal/evaluation of the type of effect the construction, operation and maintenance of a development would have on the affected environment. This description should include what is to be affected and how.
Extent of the impact
Describe whether the impact will be:
Extending only as far as the activity, or
Will have an impact on the region
Will have an impact on a national scale – particularly if an ecosystem or species of national significance is affected
Will have an impact across international borders or will impact on an ecosystem or species of international significance
Duration of impact
Impact will be where mitigation or moderation by natural process or by human intervention will not occur in such a way or in such a time span that the impact can be considered transient or temporary
Discontinuous Or Intermittent
Impact may only occur during specific climatic conditions or during a particular time of year
The specialist should establish whether the impact is destructive or benign (mild) and should be qualified as:
Affects the environment in such a way that natural, cultural and soil functions and processes are not affected
Affected environment is altered by natural, cultural and soil functions and processes continue although in a modified way
Natural, cultural or social functions or processes are altered to the extent that they will temporarily or permanently cease
Probability of occurrence
The probability of the impact actually occurring and should be described as:
Impact will occur regardless of any prevention measures
Determination of significance
Based on a synthesis or combination of the information contained in the above-described procedure; and drawing on standards, targets for Biodiversity conservation, known thresholds for ecosystem services, species or ecosystem viability, and/or carrying capacity of ecosystems; the specialist is required to assess the potential impacts in terms of the following significance criteria:
The impacts do not influence the proposed development and/or environment in any way
The impacts will have a minor influence on the proposed development and/or environment. These impacts require some attention to modification of the project design where possible, or alternative mitigation (a choice of other methods to alleviate the impacts)
The impacts will have a moderate influence on the proposed development and/or environment. The impact can be ameliorated (lessened or improved) by a modification in the project design or implementation of effective mitigation measures. Should have an influence on decision, unless it is mitigated
The impacts will have a major influence on the proposed development and/or environment. The impacts could have the no-go implication on portions of the development regardless of any mitigation measures that could be implemented. Influence decision, regardless of any possible mitigation
The specialist should state what degree of confidence there is in the predictions based on the available information and level of knowledge and expertise.
The Impacts Should Also Be Assessed In Terms Of The Following Aspects:
The specialist should identify and list the relevant South African legislation and permit requirements relevant to the development proposals. He / she should provide reference to the procedures required to obtain permits and describe whether the development proposals contravene or oppose the applicable legislation.
Status Of The Impact
The specialist should determine whether the impacts are negative, positive or neutral (this is a cost – benefit analysis). The impacts are to be assessed in terms of their effect on the project and the environment. For example, an impact that is positive for the proposed development may be negative for the environment. It is important that this distinction is made in the analysis.
Risk Or Likelihood Of Irreversible Or Irreplaceable Loss Of Natural Capital
The specialist should state clearly whether or not the impacts may be irreversible, or may result in an irreplaceable loss of Biodiversity (e.g. loss of a population, species, special habitat, threatened ecosystem). The specialist should also state the levels of uncertainty associated with making predictions of impacts.
Effects On Valued Ecosystem Services
The specialist should state clearly whether or not the impacts could result in either a degradation or deterioration of ecosystem services, and the associated implications to affected communities or society as a whole should be explained.